Comment 47 for bug 1833322
Revision history for this message
| Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote Re: [Bug 1833322] Re: Consider removing irqbalance from default install on desktop images | #47 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
Belated response, but just for the record, Paride's recounting of upstream's
position in the context of the Debian decision was definitive for me:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:47:56AM -0000, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Back in the day I asked upstream their take on irqbalance usefulness
> with newer kernels, here is their reply:
In effect what this says is that: irqbalance is still useful, but unless
the admin configures it, the policy it provides is not a discernable
improvement over the in-kernel default policy.
Therefore I think it is the right path forward to unseed this and let users
install it in situations where they want to configure it.