This is to consider/discuss the possibility of whether the Ceph packages (UCA) should be built with RelWithDebInfo build option (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE [0]) which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh [1].
Currently, Upstream as well as UCA builds default to 'Debug' [0] builds. But is any reason why shouldn't go for RelWithDebInfo (i.e. "Release with Debug information")?
There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround too [2].
In general, gcc's -O2 [3] build should generate better code as well as there's a specific case for Ceph [4] that it improves performance.
This is to consider/discuss the possibility of whether the Ceph packages (UCA) should be built with RelWithDebInfo build option (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE [0]) which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh [1].
Currently, Upstream as well as UCA builds default to 'Debug' [0] builds. But is any reason why shouldn't go for RelWithDebInfo (i.e. "Release with Debug information")?
There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround too [2].
In general, gcc's -O2 [3] build should generate better code as well as there's a specific case for Ceph [4] that it improves performance.
[0] https:/ /cmake. org/cmake/ help/latest/ variable/ CMAKE_BUILD_ TYPE.html
[1] https:/ /github. com/ceph/ ceph/blob/ master/ do_cmake. sh
[2] https:/ /docs.ceph. com/docs/ master/ dev/perf/ #common- issues
[3] https:/ /gcc.gnu. org/onlinedocs/ gcc/Optimize- Options. html
[4] https:/ /bugs.gentoo. org/show_ bug.cgi? id=733316