Re: mantic-proposed, that is weird; any mirrors in place? It looks OK in the archive:
(All cinder binary packages were available in the verification of bug 1987663.)
And regarding the failure, even with manually downloaded packages, can you confirm it worked with the test packages for Mantic, used to produce the debdiffs? -- That can help identifying/bisecting issues.
Hi Jorge,
Thanks for testing and the update.
Re: mantic-proposed, that is weird; any mirrors in place? It looks OK in the archive:
(All cinder binary packages were available in the verification of bug 1987663.)
$ curl -s http:// archive. ubuntu. com/ubuntu/ dists/mantic- proposed/ main/binary- amd64/Packages. xz | xzcat | grep-dctrl -S cinder -s Package, Source, Version
Package: cinder-api
Source: cinder
Version: 2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1.2
Package: cinder-backup
Source: cinder
Version: 2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1.2
Package: cinder-common
Source: cinder
Version: 2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1.2
Package: cinder-scheduler
Source: cinder
Version: 2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1.2
Package: cinder-volume
Source: cinder
Version: 2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1.2
Package: python3-cinder
Source: cinder
Version: 2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1.2
And regarding the failure, even with manually downloaded packages, can you confirm it worked with the test packages for Mantic, used to produce the debdiffs? -- That can help identifying/ bisecting issues.
Thanks!