Now I'm starting to wonder. volume_type_access_remove is the only place where we're using soft_delete, in other places we're just updating deleted column with True. For consistency we should decide - either go on and make all deletes use oslo.db's soft_delete, or just update volume_type_access_remove to match rest of the code. Thoughts?
Now I'm starting to wonder. volume_ type_access_ remove is the only place where we're using soft_delete, in other places we're just updating deleted column with True. For consistency we should decide - either go on and make all deletes use oslo.db's soft_delete, or just update volume_ type_access_ remove to match rest of the code. Thoughts?