Can someone confirm "Windows-SMBFS-Handle-volume_name-in-_qemu_img_info.patch" is really effective ?
Applied on master after "Refuse-invalid-qcow2-backing-files-rev3_master_69b4cfd.patch" it only adds "volume_name=None" parameter to _qemu_img_info() that seems unused (either by caller or in the function body)...
Can someone confirm "Windows- SMBFS-Handle- volume_ name-in- _qemu_img_ info.patch" is really effective ?
Applied on master after "Refuse- invalid- qcow2-backing- files-rev3_ master_ 69b4cfd. patch" it only adds "volume_name=None" parameter to _qemu_img_info() that seems unused (either by caller or in the function body)...