Log in / Register
Cinder
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1065883
Comment #5
Comment 5 for bug 1065883
Revision history for this message
Josh Durgin (jdurgin)
wrote
on 2012-10-12
:
#5
I see, that makes sense now. It'd be good to get this patch upstream for grizzly.
I see, that makes sense now. It'd be good to get this patch upstream for grizzly.
I see, that makes sense now. It'd be good to get this patch upstream for grizzly.