Juju Charms Collection
rabbitmq-server package

  1. Bug #1584902
  2. Comment #4

Comment 4 for bug 1584902

Revision history for this message
James Page (james-page) wrote :

OK - so I've done some refactoring and come up with:

  cs:~james-page/xenial/rabbitmq-server-bug1584902

This changes quite a bit about the assumptions that the charm does to resolve the hostname of the local unit; specifically it now completely skips any direct queries to DNS and just uses socket.gethostname() to set the local nodename - this also gets stored by the leader in leader storage for clustering of followers.

This makes the huge assumption that socket.gethostname() is always resolvable across the peers within a service, but I don't think that is unreasonable.