Juju Charms Collection
quantum-gateway package

  1. Bug #1379607
  2. Comment #6

Comment 6 for bug 1379607

Revision history for this message
Xiang Hui (xianghui) wrote : Re: [Bug 1379607] Re: Neutron Gateway services need HA support

Yeah, that would be a problem, so what we are doing is to test for covering
all the cases, so finally could decide which way should be used most
gracefully, e.g for hostname in ocf/upstart or use router migration.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Kaya LIU <email address hidden> wrote:

> that's fine..just wondering if the cluster will be confused with the
> same hostname in some scenarios...for example, stop the pacemaker and
> start it again on the active node.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379607
>
> Title:
> Neutron Gateway services need HA support
>
> Status in “quantum-gateway” package in Juju Charms Collection:
> In Progress
>
> Bug description:
> Support Active/Passive deployment using pacemaker and corosync.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/quantum-gateway/+bug/1379607/+subscriptions
>

--
Best Regards.
Hui.

OpenStack Engineer