Can I confirm that you are proposing that the keystone charm would pass the service_user_id along with the other service_* values along the identity-service relation ? If so I think this looks good but I'd also like to give jamespage a chance to comment too.
Can I confirm that you are proposing that the keystone charm would pass the service_user_id along with the other service_* values along the identity-service relation ? If so I think this looks good but I'd also like to give jamespage a chance to comment too.