Comment 6 for bug 1424771

FTR this is not as trivial as granting access to fixed pool names for each auth key; pool names are generated from the name of each charm, which can be changed at deployment time (think cinder-ceph, cinder-ceph-fast, cinder-ceph-slow).

The charms also need to deal with upgrading from the current open access to the proposed restricted access (so this change impacts cinder-ceph, cinder, glance, ceph-radosgw and nova-compute as well).

When you also consider that features such as ephemeral disk on ceph and COW cloning between cinder and glance thinks get quite complex fast.