Comment 8 for bug 1431045
Revision history for this message
| Antonio Rosales (arosales) wrote Re: New charm: gpfs | #8 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
@Michael,
Thanks for comment 6. Could we confirm the requirements. Initially in the description the user would need to obtain a license key, but in comment 6 you reference the need for a binary plus a license key.
It would be much easier, infrastructure wise, if we could just set a license key, and have the binary ready in the charm. The binary wouldn't work unless a valid key was set.
Ideally the charm would provide the binary, and then we would just need to solve the issue of not exposing the license key for testing. Could you confirm a binary will be provided?
-thanks,
Antonio