Comment 6 for bug 1431045

Revision history for this message
Michael Chase-Salerno (mcs-chasal) wrote : Re: New charm: gpfs

While we can't provide a publicly available gpfs binary, we can provide one to Canonical for testing purposes, just not for distribution. I know that a public version would be best, but it's not something I can get at this point.

If that's acceptable, please let me know who to get it to. Amir, I can have it sent to you if that's the most appropriate place.