Comment 12 for bug 2044983

Olivier, I don't think it's strictly correct to subscribe field-high to this bug, as it's largely a feature addition to enable new functionality. The referenced bug (#1969971) has also got a fix committed to the master branch and will most likely be backported by SEG soon. Please could you re-consider as field-high should not be used for:

> Missing functionality: A field deployment suddenly found to require functionality that does not exist does not qualify for the Field SLA. Please raise the issue with the appropriate engineering manager to determine what can be done.

Thanks.