Comment 5 for bug 1884312

The consuming end is (deliberately) anonymized and the offering end does not know details about the consumer, and why the offering end sees the remote-814c01e71f384b588d930775258f7fda/0 unit ID. The PostgreSQL interface has the same issue. A work around there is to reverse the relation, offering the client and consuming the server instead of vice-versa. Or better yet drop the anonymization in Juju, as the rationale for it likely no longer applies.