Comment 8 for bug 2069661

> uploaded patch related to this.
> could you please also consider not just reverting the original one but also the patch?
> as reverting also took a time at least.(until my timezone..)

We have to revert the patch as if we don't it would mean the charm is (deliberately) broken at that point in the git history; reverting the patch makes the repo 'clean' again. The correct thing to do, is to now rework the original patch so that it doesn't have the breaking behaviour *and* improve the testing such that the race-hazard with update-status is covered.