Comment 2 for bug 1428572

Revision history for this message
James Troup (elmo) wrote : Re: [Bug 1428572] Re: Provide oom_adj option for ceph-mon/osd

Chris Holcombe <email address hidden> writes:

> If the oom killer comes out chances are good that all bets are off. It
> can literally kill almost anything leaving your system in an undefined
> state. I would suggest that instead of trying to shield ceph from the
> oom killer that we just reboot the machine. I've seen the oom killer
> leave systems in all kinds of weird broken states that are hard to
> debug.

Sorry but this makes no sense. In the Canonical Cloud Reference
Architecture, ceph will often be running with a bunch of eminently
killable processes (e.g. user KVM instances) and it makes a ton of
sense to have the OOM killer go after them before ceph. Saying "just
never run out of memory" isn't realistic IMO.

--
James