Comment 6 for bug 1291923
Revision history for this message
| Rikimaru Honjo (honjo-rikimaru-c6) wrote | #6 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
4d1350f
(Get the code!)
Hi Gordon,
I'm Rikimaru Honjo. I assumed this task from Mitsuru. Please keeping in touch with me about this topic.
we have re-evaluated the collector's performance using Juno-1.
Due to the change in our test environment, this time we used glance image and image.size, each 10400 samples (20800 total). The result shows that Juno-1 is more than 2 times faster than Icehouse.
Using Icehouse: 50 minutes to write the 20800 samples to DB.
Using Juno-1: 18.5 minutes.
Please note that absolute times are irrelevant, since we used very old machine.
Thank you to your effort in refining the model.