Comment 10 for bug 1495871

Revision history for this message
Alexandros Frantzis (afrantzis) wrote :

>> If not, we need to ensure this is reflected in the bug status (by keeping unity8 as affected), or opening a new bug report.
> I guess this is a matter of taste, feel free to re-add it if you prefer.

I just want to make sure we track this properly, not close it when the u-a-l part is fixed (unless, of course, u-a-l turns out to be the source of all our leak instances). I guess tracking it in "Canonical System Image" should be enough for this.