Comment 2 for bug 889753

Revision history for this message
Charles Haley (cbhaley) wrote :

Sorry, but I don't understand what the problem is.

Guessing at what it might be, as a test I set the titles and timestamps on 3 books to be
title 1, timestamp 2011-11-08T13:16:26,
title D, timestamp 2011-11-08T11:21:57, and
title T, timestamp 2011-11-08T13:16:27.

After setting the display to dd MMM yyyy, I sort by title ascending, and then by timestamp descending. The three books end up in ascending title order within the timestamp, which means that the time including am/pm is being ignored. If any part of the time was considered significant, the titles would not be in the correct order.

What is it that you are seeing? Can you give examples?