Comment 12 for bug 885027
Revision history for this message
| Dan Rosenberg (dan-j-rosenberg) wrote | #12 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
It is irresponsible and a disservice to your users to introduce security vulnerabilities onto their machines unless you have very explicitly and carefully documented to those users that installing your software introduces security risks.
Can you explain why pmount, which is supported at least on Debian, Ubuntu, Red Hat, Gentoo, Fedora, Slackware, SuSE, and CentOS, is an unacceptable alternative?