Yes, I'm defining duplicate as an entry with the same text at the same level. (I rarely try to find multiple levels using the TOC editor.)
I guess I could use the tag type, but that involves opening the full book editor. In most cases, I simply use the TOC editor stand-alone, so there's no way to see the underlying HTML tags. Also, the conversion to HTML may not be consistent, so this technique might not always work.
I think the dupe-finding logic could be quite simple. I would not want to search for dupes across the entire document. It would be sufficient to eliminate all entries that are exactly the same as the prior entry.
Yes, I'm defining duplicate as an entry with the same text at the same level. (I rarely try to find multiple levels using the TOC editor.)
I guess I could use the tag type, but that involves opening the full book editor. In most cases, I simply use the TOC editor stand-alone, so there's no way to see the underlying HTML tags. Also, the conversion to HTML may not be consistent, so this technique might not always work.
I think the dupe-finding logic could be quite simple. I would not want to search for dupes across the entire document. It would be sufficient to eliminate all entries that are exactly the same as the prior entry.