On 7/27/2011 2:14 PM, Martin Pool wrote:
> after discussion in the udd meeting, i think we should backport this
> to lucid at least (2.1) and it will be reasonable to put into srus
>
I believe I started the code against bzr-2.2 because there was some
specific difference between 2.1 and 2.2 (maybe something with the test
suite?).
But sure, it does make sense to backport something like this to the
latest LTS.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 7/27/2011 2:14 PM, Martin Pool wrote:
> after discussion in the udd meeting, i think we should backport this
> to lucid at least (2.1) and it will be reasonable to put into srus
>
I believe I started the code against bzr-2.2 because there was some
specific difference between 2.1 and 2.2 (maybe something with the test
suite?).
But sure, it does make sense to backport something like this to the
latest LTS.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
79i0ACgkQJdeBCY SNAAMBgACgvQE4a q/XfPY1hwCWm1Pz T1zx IcNI7eNYHIZpKDJ kC
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAk4
TX0AnR9OP2jLXlz
=F8uM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----