Comment 4 for bug 963739

> Thanks for the heads-up, that's useful feedback.

:-)

> My first answer was probably a bit of a knee-jerk one, it's not obvious
> that all announcements should be the same though. Major releases and
> point releases for example probably don't have the same requirements.
>
> We maintain high level descriptions for each series which indeed should
> probably be given more exposure:
>
> http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.2.5/en/whats-new/whats-new-
> in-2.5.html
>
> so at least the .0 announcement should probably includes this link
> (which ends with a link to http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.2.5/en
> /release-notes/index.html for more details).
>
> Would that have addressed your issue ? What else do you think we should
> add (preferably as links to existing documents) in the announcements ?

Yes, thats exactly what I was searching for.