Comment 3 for bug 963739

Revision history for this message
Vincent Ladeuil (vila) wrote :

Thanks for the heads-up, that's useful feedback.

My first answer was probably a bit of a knee-jerk one, it's not obvious that all announcements should be the same though. Major releases and point releases for example probably don't have the same requirements.

We maintain high level descriptions for each series which indeed should probably be given more exposure:

  http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.2.5/en/whats-new/whats-new-in-2.5.html

so at least the .0 announcement should probably includes this link (which ends with a link to http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.2.5/en/release-notes/index.html for more details).

Would that have addressed your issue ? What else do you think we should add (preferably as links to existing documents) in the announcements ?