On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 15:32:27 -0000, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Vincent Ladeuil
> <email address hidden> wrote:
> > But the inverse is also true: you may forget to tell bzr to *not*
> > remember when doing a push somewhere else.
>
> True, but is that a common operation?
For me it is. The remembered location is nearly always correct for me
and I only push somewhere else as a one-off.
(A different problem is having to do multi-pushes for a longer period of
time, but that is not what this is about as far as I understand it).
When using the remembered location we say "Using saved push location: ...",
but nothing seems to be printed when pusing to another location (new or
not). Perhaps it might sense to say
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 15:32:27 -0000, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Vincent Ladeuil
> <email address hidden> wrote:
> > But the inverse is also true: you may forget to tell bzr to *not*
> > remember when doing a push somewhere else.
>
> True, but is that a common operation?
For me it is. The remembered location is nearly always correct for me
and I only push somewhere else as a one-off.
(A different problem is having to do multi-pushes for a longer period of
time, but that is not what this is about as far as I understand it).
When using the remembered location we say "Using saved push location: ...",
but nothing seems to be printed when pusing to another location (new or
not). Perhaps it might sense to say
"Not using saved push location, but instead: ..."
Or something like that?
Wouter