Comment 1 for bug 75637

I'm not sure what you mean.
It does show the revision number for the original revisions if it is a mainline revision.
Because our bzr.dev workflow has switched to using pqm, almost all of them show 'merge' at this point.

So there are 2 fixes:

1) Show the dotted revision number rather than just 'merge'.
2) Have a flag to show the exact revision id, though that necessarily takes up a lot of space.

If we do that, we may want it to not show the full user id, since we probably can just get that from the revision id.

Certainly it isn't as useful as gannotate. But I'm not sure that 'useless' is accurate.

Otherwise I'm not sure what you mean by 'traverse history.'