On 31 May 2011 17:18, Robert Collins <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
>> Is there actually any down side to just leaving stderr connected to
>> the original? It seems actually quite useful to have any extraneous
>> messages come through there, and much simpler to implement.
>
> None from my perspective. Its designed to work this way in fact :)
I don't understand your comment "or you could improve subunit" then...
On 31 May 2011 17:18, Robert Collins <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
>> Is there actually any down side to just leaving stderr connected to
>> the original? It seems actually quite useful to have any extraneous
>> messages come through there, and much simpler to implement.
>
> None from my perspective. Its designed to work this way in fact :)
I don't understand your comment "or you could improve subunit" then...