On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
> Is there actually any down side to just leaving stderr connected to
> the original? It seems actually quite useful to have any extraneous
> messages come through there, and much simpler to implement.
None from my perspective. Its designed to work this way in fact :)
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
> Is there actually any down side to just leaving stderr connected to
> the original? It seems actually quite useful to have any extraneous
> messages come through there, and much simpler to implement.
None from my perspective. Its designed to work this way in fact :)