Tim, you mentioned that the same job runs on the next iteration of sendbranchmail?
If so, we aren't seeing a repeat of this memory gobble, until a day ish later - so far. I have no idea if that's sheer co-incidence or expected. AFAIA,we've had 3 instances of this gobbling incident.
But will do a scan thru our ps(1) history looking for a more complete analysis. Details to follow.
"'this' meaning this bug, or using ulimit?"
Oops. This meaning the bug.
Tim, you mentioned that the same job runs on the next iteration of sendbranchmail?
If so, we aren't seeing a repeat of this memory gobble, until a day ish later - so far. I have no idea if that's sheer co-incidence or expected. AFAIA,we've had 3 instances of this gobbling incident.
But will do a scan thru our ps(1) history looking for a more complete analysis. Details to follow.