Robert Collins wrote:
> Have you seen TreeBuilder?
Not really — but in the case that inspired this bug report I actually
don't care about the tree contents at all. For the tests I was writing
and updating I actually just wanted to make a revision without caring
about any details except its revid and which repo object it was created
in.
I suppose BranchBuilder might have been a better fit, but the existing
tests were using make_branch_and_tree.
Robert Collins wrote:
> Have you seen TreeBuilder?
Not really — but in the case that inspired this bug report I actually
don't care about the tree contents at all. For the tests I was writing
and updating I actually just wanted to make a revision without caring
about any details except its revid and which repo object it was created
in.
I suppose BranchBuilder might have been a better fit, but the existing and_tree.
tests were using make_branch_