Comment 5 for bug 539996
Revision history for this message
| Scott James Remnant (Canonical) (canonical-scott) wrote Re: [Bug 539996] Re: bzr push should default to parent branch if that's writable | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 02:31 +0000, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 02:02 +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> >
> > If they can write to the branch, why would it be unsafe? If they
> > didn't
> > mean to push there, they wouldn't have typed "push" unguarded
>
> They might not know that bzr would push to that branch; they might have
> thought they had set an explicit target and hadn't.
>
More to the point - this is an argument against supporting implicit
targets at all!
How would a user, typing bzr push, know that it would push to the branch
they last pushed to?
Or worse, how do they know it *won't* push to the branch that they last
pushed to - and instead pushes to the branch they _first_ pushed to?
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
<email address hidden>