On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 01:23 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
> I'm not sure that would be a safe default for all workflows but it's an
> interesting suggestion.
>
If they can write to the branch, why would it be unsafe? If they didn't
mean to push there, they wouldn't have typed "push" unguarded - and they
have permission to uncommit and push --overwrite as well.
> As a workaround you should be able to do 'bzr push --remember :parent'.
>
Yes, but bzr is just being annoying ;)
bzr papercut! :D
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
<email address hidden>
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 01:23 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
> I'm not sure that would be a safe default for all workflows but it's an
> interesting suggestion.
>
If they can write to the branch, why would it be unsafe? If they didn't
mean to push there, they wouldn't have typed "push" unguarded - and they
have permission to uncommit and push --overwrite as well.
> As a workaround you should be able to do 'bzr push --remember :parent'.
>
Yes, but bzr is just being annoying ;)
bzr papercut! :D
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
<email address hidden>