Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> I understand the original reason for making the no working trees the
> default for shared repositories, but I think that decision should be
> reconsidered given the way people use repositories.
I think this sort of thing is better discussed on the list than through
the bug tracker.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> I understand the original reason for making the no working trees the
> default for shared repositories, but I think that decision should be
> reconsidered given the way people use repositories.
I think this sort of thing is better discussed on the list than through enigmail. mozdev. org
the bug tracker.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iD8DBQFEvvbg0F+ nu1YWqI0RAmnLAK CBZKenWPT4apgPS 7qq8IY3ciY8tQCd FXFD H7pEGZmo=
oU+UMd3Z0CehEId
=fQ1o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----