On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 21:07 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
> As you probably realize you can just ignore '*', but I presume here
> you want to specifically ignore only what's now in your tree.
Yes. Or more specifically what's currently unknown in my tree.
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 21:07 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
> As you probably realize you can just ignore '*', but I presume here
> you want to specifically ignore only what's now in your tree.
Yes. Or more specifically what's currently unknown in my tree.