On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 21:22 +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:
> And right now such tools are forced to be lossy because Bazaar doesn't
> provide a place for them to store the CVS per-file version numbers.
Are the per-file version numbers really something that needs to be
preserved?
Alternatively these version numbers could be stored in revision
properties.
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 21:22 +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:
> And right now such tools are forced to be lossy because Bazaar doesn't
> provide a place for them to store the CVS per-file version numbers.
Are the per-file version numbers really something that needs to be
preserved?
Alternatively these version numbers could be stored in revision
properties.
Cheers,
Jelmer