On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 00:18 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> Thats a much bigger change (since it involves updating the plugins,
> changing how they configure themselves, etc). Not to mention the changes
> to the core itself.
>
> A fix which just gives a better error is a <2hr fix. One that does what
> you are asking is about 1day. If you're willing to put in the time, fix
> it however you would like.
>
> We still need a spot in the code where post-commit hooks are run. But
> yeah, I have no problem if that is more of a factory than a single line
> config.
>
> (Actually, I prefer it, but don't feel it is worth the effort at this
> point)
Yeah, I understand your point.
I'll try to put the effort in as I'm getting tired of specifying both
post_commit hooks and the settings for those commit hooks everywhere.
(-: Not likely before 0.9 though (if it's going to be released this
week).
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 00:18 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> Thats a much bigger change (since it involves updating the plugins,
> changing how they configure themselves, etc). Not to mention the changes
> to the core itself.
>
> A fix which just gives a better error is a <2hr fix. One that does what
> you are asking is about 1day. If you're willing to put in the time, fix
> it however you would like.
>
> We still need a spot in the code where post-commit hooks are run. But
> yeah, I have no problem if that is more of a factory than a single line
> config.
>
> (Actually, I prefer it, but don't feel it is worth the effort at this
> point)
Yeah, I understand your point.
I'll try to put the effort in as I'm getting tired of specifying both
post_commit hooks and the settings for those commit hooks everywhere.
(-: Not likely before 0.9 though (if it's going to be released this
week).
Cheers,
Jelmer samba.org/ ~jelmer/
--
Jelmer Vernooij <email address hidden> - http://