On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 00:55 +0000, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > I think this one is, at most, that a warning might be useful.
> >
> > We don't warn for svn conversions though, and they are just about as
> > painful :)
>
> Not IME... All my Subversion branching and the like has been very painless
> and never run longer than 90 minutes, at most (and if that), IIRC.
And once we fix the performance issues you ran into because you were
doing the conversion over the network, I expect pack-0.92->2a to be
similar in time to a svn conversion.
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 00:55 +0000, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > I think this one is, at most, that a warning might be useful.
> >
> > We don't warn for svn conversions though, and they are just about as
> > painful :)
>
> Not IME... All my Subversion branching and the like has been very painless
> and never run longer than 90 minutes, at most (and if that), IIRC.
And once we fix the performance issues you ran into because you were
doing the conversion over the network, I expect pack-0.92->2a to be
similar in time to a svn conversion.
-Rob