Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 22:47 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
>> I think now that we are in the second release since shared repositories
>> came out, it would be wise to switch so that 'bzr branch' into a shared
>> repository respects the repository settings, rather than the source.
>>
>> Otherwise there is always the 'bzr init; bzr pull' workaround.
>>
>> I would like to see this happen for 0.9, but we need to discuss it again
>> first.
>
> I think bzr branch should *always* respect the format of the source.
I think "always" is too strong a word; at minimum, users should be able
to supply --format to override the format.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 22:47 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
>> I think now that we are in the second release since shared repositories
>> came out, it would be wise to switch so that 'bzr branch' into a shared
>> repository respects the repository settings, rather than the source.
>>
>> Otherwise there is always the 'bzr init; bzr pull' workaround.
>>
>> I would like to see this happen for 0.9, but we need to discuss it again
>> first.
>
> I think bzr branch should *always* respect the format of the source.
I think "always" is too strong a word; at minimum, users should be able
to supply --format to override the format.
Aaron enigmail. mozdev. org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iD8DBQFEwdfY0F+ nu1YWqI0RAhkVAJ 9xeoytmNwZ9ysmg ADhR1cLw8dRoACf aN2A TvMMCYlHThQ=
0JXo5dzorKm+
=yirs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----