On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 01:39:12AM -0000, Martin Pool wrote:
> Thanks Tim.
>
> It looks like that's in IBM-850 (aka cp850), with ü as codepoint 0x81
> and ö as cp 0x94. It may be that cp850 is the right thing to write to
> the terminal but if you're in a utf-8 locale and redirected to a file it
> should probably write utf-8.
Drive-by-bug-commenting: aren't the filesystem encoding and the terminal
encoding seperated in Windows? I recall bialix having trouble in that
area in the past.
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 01:39:12AM -0000, Martin Pool wrote:
> Thanks Tim.
>
> It looks like that's in IBM-850 (aka cp850), with ü as codepoint 0x81
> and ö as cp 0x94. It may be that cp850 is the right thing to write to
> the terminal but if you're in a utf-8 locale and redirected to a file it
> should probably write utf-8.
Drive-by- bug-commenting: aren't the filesystem encoding and the terminal
encoding seperated in Windows? I recall bialix having trouble in that
area in the past.
Wouter van Heyst