On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Robert Collins
<email address hidden> wrote:
> we could use a simple google-search like metaphor and treat -foo as
> 'without foo' (assuming there is no actual path -foo). And when there is
> a -foo include it or error or something.
I think that's fine in a web ui but would be pretty weird on a unix
command line, as -foo already looks like the options -f -o -o.
I agree, -x goo and --exclude-from /tmp/exclude.lst
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Robert Collins
<email address hidden> wrote:
> we could use a simple google-search like metaphor and treat -foo as
> 'without foo' (assuming there is no actual path -foo). And when there is
> a -foo include it or error or something.
I think that's fine in a web ui but would be pretty weird on a unix
command line, as -foo already looks like the options -f -o -o.
I agree, -x goo and --exclude-from /tmp/exclude.lst
-- launchpad. net/~mbp/>
Martin <http://