Perhaps. For me, I am running my servers on 8.04 -- so whilst a
backport would be one way to address this my concern is how much (if
any) security support bzr is likely to receive.
From that page, it appears it is a 'best-effort' basis. That is okay,
but I've restricted myself to using just 'main' so that security
support is available all the time.
Perhaps. For me, I am running my servers on 8.04 -- so whilst a
backport would be one way to address this my concern is how much (if
any) security support bzr is likely to receive.
From that page, it appears it is a 'best-effort' basis. That is okay,
but I've restricted myself to using just 'main' so that security
support is available all the time.
Anand
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 150438 /help.ubuntu. com/community/ UbuntuBackports> launchpad. net/~mbp/> /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 301592
> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 150438 ***
> https:/
>
> It might be good to put a newer bzr into
> <https:/
>
> --
> Martin <http://
>
> --
> Bazaar has encountered an internal error when removing a directory manually removed
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug (via bug 150438).
>
>