> I'll bet its the new nickname behaviour.
>
me too,
As far as I remember, it tries to obtain the nick of the master branch
and if that fails then it uses the local implicit nickname.
So do you guys think it should not even try to get the master-branch-nick
when --local is specified?
2008/11/18 Robert Collins <email address hidden>
> I'll bet its the new nickname behaviour.
>
me too,
As far as I remember, it tries to obtain the nick of the master branch
and if that fails then it uses the local implicit nickname.
So do you guys think it should not even try to get the master-branch-nick
when --local is specified?