On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 05:46 +0000, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>
> When there are local commits, update resets the branch's last_revision
> and makes the tree's last_revision into a pending merge. Doing this
> means that if the user reverts, they throw away their local commits.
>
> If we just fix update so that it doesn't create a situation where
> revert
> will throw away local commits, this complaint would go away.
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 05:46 +0000, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>
> When there are local commits, update resets the branch's last_revision
> and makes the tree's last_revision into a pending merge. Doing this
> means that if the user reverts, they throw away their local commits.
>
> If we just fix update so that it doesn't create a situation where
> revert
> will throw away local commits, this complaint would go away.
That would involve crippling update.
-Rob
-- www.robertcolli ns.net/ keys.txt>.
GPG key available at: <http://