* Martin Pool <email address hidden> [08/03/05 11:09]:
> I've branched from
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Estatik/%2Bjunk/mysql-5.0/ into a shared
> repository, and ran bzr viz, and gannotate on a few files including
> sql/mysqld.cc.
> For me (1.4GHz Core2 Duo), bzr 1.2.0 the gui commands generally come up
> in a few seconds. mysqld.cc, which I understand has been heavily
> edited, comes up in about 30s. (It would be good to be faster than
> that, but it's not as bad as the original report.)
>
> So I think there is some confounding factor. Is the machine swapping
> perhaps?
No, the load is cpu-bound, uses one core only.
I used 5.1 tree, which has more changesets than 5.0 tree.
--
-- Konstantin Osipov Software Developer, Moscow, Russia
-- MySQL AB, www.mysql.com The best DATABASE COMPANY in the GALAXY
* Martin Pool <email address hidden> [08/03/05 11:09]: bazaar. launchpad. net/%7Estatik/ %2Bjunk/ mysql-5. 0/ into a shared
> I've branched from
> http://
> repository, and ran bzr viz, and gannotate on a few files including
> sql/mysqld.cc.
> For me (1.4GHz Core2 Duo), bzr 1.2.0 the gui commands generally come up
> in a few seconds. mysqld.cc, which I understand has been heavily
> edited, comes up in about 30s. (It would be good to be faster than
> that, but it's not as bad as the original report.)
>
> So I think there is some confounding factor. Is the machine swapping
> perhaps?
No, the load is cpu-bound, uses one core only.
I used 5.1 tree, which has more changesets than 5.0 tree.
--
-- Konstantin Osipov Software Developer, Moscow, Russia
-- MySQL AB, www.mysql.com The best DATABASE COMPANY in the GALAXY