On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:15 +0000, Alexander Belchenko wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> James Westby пишет:
> | This appears to be a duplicate of bug #184898.
> |
> | Jeroen, do you have bzr-gtk installed?
> |
> | Alexander, is there any chance that what was packaged
> | as 1.1 for windows was in fact a couple of revisions older
> | than the 1.1 branch? The fix for this was the penultimate
> | commit before 1.1 was branched, so it should be in
> | 1.1.
>
> No, I'm always build from the official source tarball.
> Check it first, please.
> Or say me where to look and what to looking for.
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:15 +0000, Alexander Belchenko wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> James Westby пишет:
> | This appears to be a duplicate of bug #184898.
> |
> | Jeroen, do you have bzr-gtk installed?
> |
> | Alexander, is there any chance that what was packaged
> | as 1.1 for windows was in fact a couple of revisions older
> | than the 1.1 branch? The fix for this was the penultimate
> | commit before 1.1 was branched, so it should be in
> | 1.1.
>
> No, I'm always build from the official source tarball.
> Check it first, please.
> Or say me where to look and what to looking for.
Hey, the tarball at
https:/ /launchpad. net/bzr/ 1.1/1.1/ +download/ bzr-1.1. tar.gz
doesn't include the fix. However
http:// codebrowse. launchpad. net/~mbp/ bzr/bzr. 1.1/annotate/ pqm% com-20080115030 052-x4n7l0pf5g5 icfp4?file_ id=pack_ repo.py- 20070813041115- gjv5ma7ktfqwsjg n-1
40pqm.ubuntu.
says that it should.
Martin, was it you that released 1.1. Can you explain what happened
here?
Alexander, I should never have doubted you, my apologies.
Thanks,
James