Comment 5 for bug 187106
Revision history for this message
| John A Meinel (jameinel) wrote Re: bzr from standalone installer has poor performance on Vista | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
There is some very interesting actions going on. Specifically if you look at:
618.0 618.0 ++++ atexit @ logging:1363
614.0 614.0 ++++ threading @ logging:38
609.0 609.0 ++++ string @ logging:29
603.0 603.0 ++++ traceback @ logging:29
It seems like *each* import XXX from the standard library is costing ~600ms. If you look through the output you see ~600 show up a lot of times.
I wonder if each access is causing the virus software to scan the whole .zip file, which is takes approx 600ms. Or maybe just some sort of strange context switch delay?