Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> I remember some core dev saying that `bzr ls` was to be preferred over
> commands like `bzr unknowns`. There are still commands whose functionality
> is not covered by `bzr ls`, like `bzr modified`, and `bzr added`.
The idea, as I understood it, was to put filters on existing behavior,
not introduce new behavior. So I think --modified belongs on `status`,
not `ls`.
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> I remember some core dev saying that `bzr ls` was to be preferred over
> commands like `bzr unknowns`. There are still commands whose functionality
> is not covered by `bzr ls`, like `bzr modified`, and `bzr added`.
The idea, as I understood it, was to put filters on existing behavior,
not introduce new behavior. So I think --modified belongs on `status`,
not `ls`.
Aaron