On 25 March 2010 02:04, INADA Naoki <email address hidden> wrote:
> I think bzr should handle filename as canonical (NFC or NFD) unicode.
This seems reasonable.
It will mean we can't represent a directory of for example test data
containing filenames with different representations of the same
characters. You could have such a directory on Linux (and Windows?)
but you could not check it out on Mac OS. You can see this as
inconsistent with how we handle case-sensitivity: we don't fold
everything to lowercase because some systems are case-insensitive.
But perhaps they are not really analogous.
On 25 March 2010 02:04, INADA Naoki <email address hidden> wrote:
> I think bzr should handle filename as canonical (NFC or NFD) unicode.
This seems reasonable.
It will mean we can't represent a directory of for example test data
containing filenames with different representations of the same
characters. You could have such a directory on Linux (and Windows?)
but you could not check it out on Mac OS. You can see this as
inconsistent with how we handle case-sensitivity: we don't fold
everything to lowercase because some systems are case-insensitive.
But perhaps they are not really analogous.
-- launchpad. net/~mbp/>
Martin <http://