Comment 9 for bug 120697
Revision history for this message
| Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote Re: [Bug 120697] Re: bzr shouldn't bypass http caches | #9 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 00:56 +0000, Matt Nordhoff wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > I think we should keep this open a bit longer.
> >
> > Specifically, the current code assumes all files are equally hard to
> > cache. This is bogus.
> >
> > e.g.
> > foo.knit: not safe to cache
> > foo.kndx: not safe to cache
> > branch.conf: not safe to cache
> > 384786864102764
> > 384786864102764
> > branch-format: safe to cache
> > format: safe to cache
> > lock/*: not safe to cache.
> >
> > etc.
>
> branch-format and format aren't really safe to cache. What if someone
> runs 'bzr upgrade'?
Well, there's safe and safe I guess.
on the one hand those files change very rarely.
on the other they matter quite a bit :).
-Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://