Comment 11 for bug 120697
Revision history for this message
| Martin Pool (mbp) wrote Re: bzr shouldn't bypass http caches | #11 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
Debian says this was fixed by the introduction of the packs format, which is a bit weird. Oh well.
It looks like the remaining part of this bug is that we want a way to say, on a particular Transport operation, that the file we're reading is potentially cacheable. This would be safe to set if the file is never modified once it has been written, which is true for pack and index contents.
I'm going to mark vincent's old patch as "not a patch" as it's not actually a foundation for closing this bug.